Howdy!
Since I was talking about licensing images yesterday, I figured it would dovetail nicely with these three images…
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98061/980619cc69398c6123036aa4e673f5bd6ee415dd" alt="Russell Young copying Damien Hirst with a bootleg image of Marilyn Monroe, I think... Russell Young copying Damien Hirst with a bootleg image of Marilyn Monroe, I think..."
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1f035/1f0355373525a3cfedf116927ff5e1c9bf938252" alt="An unknown artist's painting of Tintin An unknown artist's painting of Tintin"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/14fc3/14fc3f1ec228c1fe8adeb0554171d08348f3e9ee" alt="Crappy close-up of an unknown artist's painting of Tintin Crappy close-up of an unknown artist's painting of Tintin"
Last week I was walking along Greene Avenue when I saw these magnificent paintings in the window of the Galerie de Bellefeuille. While I don’t think there is a patent on spraying diamond dust on silkscreen prints, I would bet dollars to doughnuts that Russell Young is not paying any royalties to the Michael Ochs Archives or Getty Images for his use of their photograph. (Which if I did the drop down boxes properly would cost somewhere around $600)
And while I’m not entirely certain (after all I did take a crappy and blurry picture) but it certainly does look like a painting of Tintin, and again I would bet dollars to doughnuts (Tim Horton’s even!) that someone forgot to cut a check to Paramount Pictures for their royalties…